MM_PHI-384-OL009_Ethics _ Business Professional_ Application Assignment. Review Section 2.3, “Comparing the Virtue Ethics of East and West,” of the Business Ethics text including the What Would You Do feature
Review Section 2.3, “Comparing the Virtue Ethics of East and West,” of the Business Ethics text including the What Would You Do feature, “Scenario with Aristotle and Confucius,” as well as the Link to Learning resource at the end of Section 2.3.
Consider the following, as noted in Business Ethics, Chapter 2, Section 2.3: Virtue ethics is the integration of personal and professional life. A person could not act one way at home and a completely different way in public.
What might the integration of personal and professional life look like, and how can we apply it within the relationships that are the foundation of business? To answer this question, consider the essence of the virtuous person that each ethical system strove to create.
Write a 2- to 3-page paper (minimum of 500 words) in APA format comparing the perspectives of Aristotelian and Confucian virtue ethics. Your paper should answer the following questions: How do personal and professional roles relate to one another based on Aristotelian and Confucian virtue ethics? How do Aristotle and Confucius define a virtuous individual?
How does the concept of virtue through education apply to individual and professional ethical standards?
How can a virtue approach help to inform ethical conduct in professional settings?
Describe issues related to ethical relativism in a global context as raised by the Chiquita case study. How could a virtue approach inform universal standards to address issues raised in a global business environment such as those raised in the Chiquita case? [MO 1.2, MO 1.3, MO 1.4]
When it comes to ethics, there are two general schools of thought: the Virtue Ethics of the East, and the Utilitarianism of the West. Both have their pros and cons, but which one is really better? In this blog post, we will compare these two ethical theories and see which one comes out on top.
The Virtue Ethics of the East is based on the idea of “the good life.” This means that the goal of ethics is not simply to do what is right or wrong, but to live a life that is fulfilling and meaningful. To achieve this, one must cultivate virtue. The problem with this approach is that it can be difficult to know what the “good life” actually is. It also requires a great deal of self-discipline, which not everyone has.
The Utilitarianism of the West, on the other hand, is based on the principle of utility: that is, what brings about the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This approach is more straightforward and easier to apply than Virtue Ethics, but it can sometimes lead to ethical problems if people are only interested in their own happiness and not that of others.
So, which one is better? The answer may depend on your personal preferences. If you’re looking for an ethical theory that is easy to apply and understand, then Utilitarianism might be right for you. But if you’re someone who is interested in living a meaningful and fulfilling life, then the Virtue Ethics of the East might be a better fit. Whichever you choose, just make sure you think about it carefully before making your decision!
There is a long-standing debate between two of the most famous philosophers of all time: Aristotle and Confucius. They hold opposing viewpoints on many subjects, but one in particular has been debated for centuries: which philosopher is right? In this article, we will explore the arguments of both sides and see who comes out on top.
Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who believed in the power of reason and logic. He believed that the world could be understood through careful study and observation. Aristotle’s philosophy was based on the belief that knowledge is power, and that understanding the natural world is essential to living a good life.
Confucius was a Chinese philosopher who believed in the power of tradition and morality. He believed that people should follow the customs and traditions of their ancestors. Confucius’ philosophy was based on the belief that human beings are fundamentally good, and that we should strive to live up to our potential.
So, who is right? Aristotle or Confucius? There is no easy answer, but we can explore the arguments of both sides to see who has the stronger case.
Aristotle’s argument is based on the idea of knowledge as power. He believes that if we understand the natural world, we can live better lives. This is because understanding the world allows us to make better decisions about how to live our lives. For example, if we understand how the weather works, we can better prepare for storms. If we understand how plants grow, we can better care for them.
Confucius’ argument is based on the idea of human goodness. He believes that people are fundamentally good, and that we should strive to live up to our potential. This is because living up to our potential allows us to make the world a better place. For example, if we are kind and honest, we can create a more just society. If we are hardworking and diligent, we can create a more prosperous economy.
So, who is right? Aristotle or Confucius? There is no easy answer, but both philosophers make strong arguments. In the end, it may come down to a matter of personal preference. Do you believe that knowledge is power, or do you believe that human beings are fundamentally good? Whichever philosopher you side with, there is no denying that both Aristotle and Confucius were great thinkers who had a profound impact on the world.