Learning Activity: Monitoring Observed Policy Outcomes. After viewing this week’s presentations and completing the reading assignments
After viewing this week’s presentations and completing the reading assignments, each student is to write their own Discussion Board (DB) question on the topic of policy analysis and assembling evidence based on the readings and course content. Then, provide a comprehensive, well-reasoned and evidence-based response to your own prompt in 250–500 words. You will submit your response as a paper assignment.
Remember that the response must be thoughtful and comprehensive, citing outside sources as supporting evidence (details, sensible approach) and the writing represents Strayer Writing Standards and style in tone, clarity, citations and stylistic points.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Project monitoring is a very basic but mandatory phase for any project manager. Keeping stakeholders up to date on progress and team performance through reports and on-going documentation contributes to project success. Regularly assessing progress related to scope, benchmark goals, timeline, and budget helps to ensure that there are no unpleasant surprises as the project unfolds.
Project evaluation is a process of collecting, recording and organizing information about project results and lessons learned for future projects which are captured during the Closure phase.
Firstly, it provides the only consolidated source of information showcasing project progress;
Secondly, it allows actors to learn from each other’s experiences, building on expertise and knowledge;
Thirdly, it often generates (written) reports that contribute to transparency and accountability, and allows for lessons to be shared more easily;
Additionally, it reveals mistakes and offers paths for learning and improvements;
Further, it provides a basis for questioning and testing assumptions;
Also, it provides a means for agencies seeking to learn from their experiences and to incorporate them into policy and practice;
Furthermore, it provides a way to assess the crucial link between implementers and beneficiaries on the ground and decision-makers;
Moreover, it adds to the retention and development of institutional memory;
Finally, it provides a more robust basis for raising funds and influencing policy.