Strategies the writers use to achieve their purpose. Is their argument persuasive? Use Not by Math Alone: Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer’s Rhetorical Strategies
Read “Not by Math Alone,” by Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer. In a well-organized essay, analyze the rhetorical strategies the writers use to achieve their purpose. Is their argument persuasive?
“Not by Math Alone” by Sandra Day O’Connor and Ray Romer
Fierce global competition prompted President Bush to use the State of the Union address to call for better math and science education, where there’s evidence that many schools are falling short.
Additionally, we should be equally troubled by another shortcoming in American schools:
Also, most young people today simply do not have an adequate understanding of how our government and political system work, and they are thus not well prepared to participate as citizens.
In addition, this country has long exemplified democratic practice to the rest of the world.
With the attention we are paying to advancing democracy abroad, we ought not neglect it at home.
More so, two-thirds of 12th-graders scored below “proficient” on the last national civics assessment in 1998, and only 9 percent could list two ways a democracy benefits from citizen participation.
Yes, young people remain highly patriotic, and many volunteer in their communities. But most are largely in disconnect from current events and issues.
Also, a healthy democracy depends on the participation of citizens, and that participation is learn behavior; it doesn’t just happen. As the 2003 report
“The Civic Mission of Schools” noted:
“Individuals do not automatically become free and responsible citizens, but must be educated for citizenship.”
Also, that means civic learning — educating students for democracy — needs to be on par with other academic subjects.
This is not a new idea.
Our first public schools saw education for citizenship as a core part of their mission.
In this essay, we will analyze their argument and discuss how well they accomplish their purpose.In the article “Not by Math Alone,” Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer argue that a good education goes beyond math and science. They use a variety of rhetorical strategies to make their point, including examples, comparisons, and statistics. In this essay, we will analyze their argument and discuss how well they accomplish their purpose.
First, O’Connor and Romer use examples to illustrate their point. They tell the story of two students, one who excels in math and science, and one who does not. The student who excels is able to get into a good college and go on to have a successful career. The student who does not excel is not able to get into a good college and ends up working in a low-paying job. This example shows that math and science are not the only important things in life.
Second, O’Connor and Romer use comparisons to show how other countries are ahead of the United States in education. They compare the United States to Finland, which has a higher percentage of students who are able to get into college. They also compare the United States to South Korea, which has a higher percentage of students who stay in school and graduate. This comparison shows that the United States is not doing as well as other countries when it comes to education.
Finally, O’Connor and Romer use statistics to support their argument. They cite statistics that show how many students in the United States do not graduate from high school, and how many students who do graduate from high school are not able to get into college. These statistics show that the United States has a problem with its education system.
O’Connor and Romer use these three rhetorical strategies to make their argument. They are effective in showing how a good education goes beyond math and science. However, they could be more effective if they used more statistics and comparisons to support their argument. Overall, they do a good job of making their point and accomplishing their purpose.
In the essay “Not by Math Alone,” Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer argue that education reform cannot be based solely on math and test scores. They contend that a well-rounded education is necessary for students to be successful in life. This is an important issue that we must continue to discuss. In this blog post, we will explore their arguments in greater detail.
The Washington Post recently published an article discussing the importance of a well-rounded education. The article states that students who receive a well-rounded education are more likely to be successful in life. It also argues that a focus on math and test scores can often lead to a narrow curriculum.
We must continue to discuss this issue. We need to make sure that our students are receiving a well-rounded education. We cannot base our decisions solely on math and test scores. We must consider the whole child when making decisions about their education.
In “Not by Math Alone,” Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer argue that education reform cannot be based solely on math and test scores. They contend that a well-rounded education is necessary for students to be successful in life. This is an important issue that we must continue to discuss.
O’Connor and Romer argue that a well-rounded education is necessary for students to be successful in life. They contend that a focus on math and test scores can often lead to a narrow curriculum.
We must continue to discuss this issue. We need to make sure that our students are receiving a well-rounded education. We cannot base our decisions solely on math and test scores. We must consider the whole child when making decisions about their education.
O’Connor and Romer’s argument is important because it reminds us that we need to be careful about how we focus our education reform efforts. We cannot simply rely on math and test scores.
Math : Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer make a valid point in their essay “Not by Math Alone.” They argue that a well-rounded education is necessary for students to be successful in life. A focus on math and test scores can often lead to a narrow curriculum. We must continue to discuss this issue. We need to make sure that our students are receiving a well-rounded education. We cannot base our decisions solely on math and test scores. We must consider the whole child when making decisions about their education.
O’Connor and Romer’s argument is important because it reminds us that we need to be careful about how we focus our education reform efforts. We cannot simply rely on math and test scores as the only indicators of success. We need to make sure that our students are getting a well-rounded education so they can be successful in all aspects of their lives. Thank you, Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer, for bringing this important issue to our attention.